• home
  • bourbon
  • links
  • blog
  • bio
  • contact form
               donstacy.com

Acknowledgments for Liberation Biology

9/23/2012

 
A thorough review of the Acknowledgments chapter of Ronald Bailey's Liberation Biology requires that the LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOGger provide negative information regarding three entities: Reason magazine, the Richard Lounsbery Foundation, and Nick Schulz.  

#1: I canceled my Reason magazine subscription in the distant past due to mockery of the plumbline libertarian position.  #2: The Richard Lounsbery Foundation was listed as a "conservative" organization in a The Boston Phoenix review of college funding.  #3: Nick Schulz is a Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, generally recognized as a leading conservative/neoconservative "think tank."

Contrary to popular opinion, Acknowledgments chapters are important.

Libertarian Critique of Engelhardt 2

9/16/2012

 
Today the LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOGger finally read Sigrid Fry-Revere's 1992 article in the The Journal of Clinical Ethics titled "A Libertarian Critique of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.'s The Foundations of Bioethics."

The good: Fry-Revere's discussion of the 'personhood' conundrum is intriguing.  The bad: The author does not present a comprehensive libertarian bioethics theory.  The ugly: The writer's critique of Engelhardt, Jr.'s book is valid but tedious.

The 'personhood' quandary will be the focus of the remainder of this post.  Fry-Revere implicitly rejects Ayn Rand's objectivist bioethics theory by dismissing the potentiality argument utilized by Rand to assert that fetuses, infants, and the mentally retarded have rights while animals do not have rights.  Incidentally, Engelhardt denies the plausibility of the potentiality argument and believes that marginal humans (fetuses, children, the mentally retarded, and animals) do not have rights.  Fry-Revere reaches the same conclusion as Rand in the marginal humans debate by claiming that a being achieves 'personhood' when the being possesses "the minimum amount of mental equipment necessary" to exhibit reason "regardless of whether it is ever employed."  The latter qualification maintains 'personhood' for the following groups possessing the appropriate reasoning tools: sleeping beings, stupid beings, and ill beings.  Fry-Revere's 'personhood' principle is novel and impressive and persuasive.  Do critics view her argument as a sophisticated variant of the potentiality argument?  I can think of no other obvious objections, but I shall seek and report powerful contrary opinions.    

Acknowledgments for Lives at Risk

9/9/2012

 
The acknowledgments provided by the authors for Lives at Risk: Single-Payer National Health Insurance Around the World are not comforting for the libertarian reader.  Staff from the following five conservative "think tanks" are thanked: National Center for Policy Analysis, Manhattan Institute, Fraser Institute, Adam Smith Institute, and the Institute of Economic Affairs.  The LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOGger will read on, however, for knowledge is gained when one absorbs correct OR incorrect theory.  

Chapter 1 Principles of Biomedical Ethics Sixth Edition

9/3/2012

 
The first chapter of the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics is a discussion of what the authors call moral norms.  The following topics drew the interest of the LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOGger: common morality and choosing between conflicting moral norms.  I will limit my comments to these two topics, for the remainder of the chapter is merely a summary of medical ethics.

The common morality is defined by the authors as "the set of norms shared by all person committed to morality."  The authors describe the common morality as universal, normative, nonnormative, historical, and nonrelative.  Hence, Beauchamp and Childress assert that their common morality theory is all things to all people.  Objection #1 is the idea that a universal common morality somehow does not apply to persons not committed to morality.  I strongly argue that a universal common morality must apply to each person regardless of each person's commitment to morality.  Otherwise, the common morality does not apply to Stalin or Hitler or Lincoln.  Objection #2 is the idea that the common morality consists of "norms about right and wrong human conduct that are so widely shared that they form a stable (although incomplete) social agreement."  This sounds suspiciously like a common morality social contract theory, which is a major problem because plumbline libertarianism rejects the absurdly erroneous social contract theory.  In addition, the authors implicitly endorse an appeal to authority (the "widely shared" concept), which is an obvious error of rational thinking.  Objection #3  is the complete avoidance of the objective principle that actually underlies the common morality: self-ownership.

I close by commenting on the discussion by the authors regarding choosing between conflicting moral norms.  Beauchamp and Childress provide 6 conditions that "must be met to justify infringing one prima facie norm to adhere to another."  Objection #1 is that the authors object, in principle, to absolute norm(s).  Yet, self-ownership is an absolute norm that underlies the common morality.  This rejection of any absolute norm is the reason the authors's theory is so damn complicated, for non-absolute norms are perpetually in conflict.  Objection #2 is that the six conditions can be interpreted subjectively.  For example, one condition states that the "moral objective justifying the infringement has a realistic prospect of achievement."  Because the word realistic cannot be objectively defined this particular condition is not helpful to resolve conflict in a non-arbitrary manner.  Objection #3 is the fact that the six conditions remind this libertarian reader of nearly all anti-liberty arguments.  Non-libertarians commonly profess support for liberty except in certain conditions or but not in certain conditions or only if certain conditions are applicable.  Remedial Right Only theories of secession fall into this category, which is a category plumbline libertarians loathe. 
 

    LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG

    Author

    Don Stacy is a 43 yo libertarian writer and physician and bioethics graduate student.  His articles have been published by multiple libertarian-themed websites.  He practices medicine as a radiation oncologist in Louisville, KY and Jeffersonville, IN.     

    Archives

    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010

    Categories

    All
    4 Fundamental Principles
    4 Step Heathcare Solution
    Abigail Alliance
    Abraham Lincoln
    Afterbirth Abortion
    Afterbirth Abortion 2
    Ama Bioethics Principles
    Amnesty International
    Animal Rights
    Animal Rights 2
    Banning A Risky Product
    Beneficence
    Bioethics Consults
    Blog Name
    Blog Plan
    Brain-Dead Bioethics
    Brain Dead Bioethics 2
    British Health Care
    Cancer Drugs
    C.I.A. Doctors
    Circumcision
    Classical-Liberal Bioethics
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 2
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 3
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 4
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 5
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 6
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 7
    Clinical Trials Reporting
    Clinical Trials Reporting 2
    Code Of Federal Regs
    Contractarianism
    Cooperative Groups
    Economics Of Healthcare
    Economics Of Healthcare 2
    Engelhardt And Children
    Engelhardt And Children 2
    Euthanasia
    Evidence-Based Medicine
    Facebook Ethics
    Genetic Results Return
    Genetic Results Return 2
    Guatemala S.T.D. Study
    Influenza Vaccination
    Inst. Review Boards
    Inst. Review Boards 2
    Inst. Review Boards 3
    Inst. Review Boards 4
    Inst. Review Boards 5
    Justice
    Just Price
    Kidney Sellers
    Kidney Sellers 10
    Kidney Sellers 11
    Kidney Sellers 12
    Kidney Sellers 13
    Kidney Sellers 14
    Kidney Sellers 15
    Kidney Sellers 2
    Kidney Sellers 3
    Kidney Sellers 4
    Kidney Sellers 5
    Kidney Sellers 6
    Kidney Sellers 7
    Kidney Sellers 8
    Kidney Sellers 9
    Liberation Biology
    Liberation Biology 2
    Liberation Biology 3
    Liberation Biology 4
    Liberation Biology 5
    Liberation Biology 6
    Liberation Biology 7
    Liberation Biology 8
    Liberation Biology 9
    Libertarian Bioethics
    Libertarian Premises
    Libertarian Premises 2
    Liberty Bioeth And Relig
    Liberty Bioeth And Relig 2
    Liberty Encyclopedia
    Liberty Encyclopedia 2
    Liberty Engelhardt Crit.
    Liberty Engelhardt Crit. 2
    Lives At Risk
    Lives At Risk 2
    Lives At Risk 3
    Lives At Risk 4
    Lives At Risk 5
    Lives At Risk 6
    Lives At Risk 7
    Lives At Risk 8
    Lives At Risk 9
    Mandatory Research Biopsies
    Money May Matter
    National Cancer Institute
    National Cancer Institute 2
    Neuroethics
    Nonmaleficence
    Organ Donation
    P.G.D.
    Phys. For Human Rights 1
    Phys. For Human Rights 2
    Political Triage
    Principles For Allocation
    Principles Of Bioethics
    Principles Of Bioethics 10
    Principles Of Bioethics 2
    Principles Of Bioethics 3
    Principles Of Bioethics 4
    Principles Of Bioethics 5
    Principles Of Bioethics 6
    Principles Of Bioethics 7
    Principles Of Bioethics 8
    Principles Of Bioethics 9
    Rationing Cancer Care
    Respect For Autonomy
    RTOG & NSABP
    Secrecy And Radiation
    Showing That You Care
    Sigrid Fry-Revere
    Skid Row
    Soviet Medicine
    Soviet Medicine 2
    Test
    The Carriage-Trade Trend
    The Chemist's War
    The Expanding Circle
    The Expanding Circle 2
    The Expanding Circle 3
    The Expanding Circle 4
    The Expanding Circle 5
    The Expanding Circle 6
    The Expanding Circle 7
    The Expanding Circle 8
    The Expanding Circle 9
    The Nathaniel Centre
    Tuskegee Syphilis Study
    U.N.E.S.C.O.
    U.S. Human Experiments
    U.S. Medical Experiments
    Warning Labels
    What It Feels Like
    What It Feels Like 2
    What It Feels Like 3
    Why Health Is Not Special

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    ANARCHO-CAPITALIST FLAG
Web Hosting by IPOWER