• home
  • bourbon
  • links
  • blog
  • bio
  • contact form
               donstacy.com

Principles of Bioethics

4/26/2011

 
The "ETHICS IN MEDICINE" section of the University of Washington School of Medicine website contains a "Principles of Bioethics" segment.  This portion of the website summarizes the 4 fundamental principles of bioethics I have previously discussed in this blog.  No new ground is covered in the discussions of respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. 

The "Principles of Bioethics" segment does, however, include an interesting subsection titled 'How do principles "apply" to a certain case?'  This subsection considers what to do when two or more bioethical principles are in conflict in an example case.  The analysis of the example case is illustrative of non-libertarian bioethical thinking.

The website example case asks the reader to "consider a patient diagnosed with an acutely infected appendix."  The reader is informed that the "medical goal should be to provide the greatest benefit to the patient, an indication for immediate surgery."  This is the principle of beneficence.  The bioethical principle in conflict with this decision, however, is the obligation to not harm a patient, otherwise known as nonmaleficence, for "surgery and general anesthesia carry some small degree of risk to an otherwise healthy patient."  The reader is advised that the appropriate course of action is to "balance the demands of these principles by determining which carries more weight in the particular case."  The conclusion for the example case is "the patient is in far greater danger from harm from a ruptured appendix if we do not act, than from the surgical procedure and anesthesia if we proceed quickly to surgery." 

The non-libertarian finds nothing controversial in the analysis of this example case.  The libertarian, however, immediately notes that the discussion completely ignores the ultimate decision-maker in this scenario.  The ultimate decision-maker, per libertarian theory, is the justly acquired property owner.  The "justly acquired property" in the example case is the appendix of the patient.  The owner of the "justly acquired property" in the example case is, obviously, the patient.  Thus, the ultimate decision-maker in the example case is the patient with the acutely inflamed appendix.  By definition, then, the physician is not the ultimate decision-maker.  The physician, therefore, cannot "proceed quickly to surgery."  The physician can only "balance the demands of these principles by determining which carries more weight in the particular case" and then give a recommendation to the patient, who will make the ultimate decision.  

This shift in focus from the physician as ultimate decision-maker to patient as ultimate decision-maker is the difference between paternalism and autonomy, aggression and non-aggression, slavery and liberty.  This distinction may seem trivial to the non-libertarian.  The libertarian, once again, knows the truth.      

Lives at Risk

4/19/2011

 
An acquaintance recently requested that I read and review (on this blog) Lives at Risk: Single-Payer National Health Insurance Around the World by John Goodman, Gerald Musgrave, and Devon Herrick.  I instantaneously forgot this appeal until tonight, at which time I ordered the paperback version from Amazon.com.  A Google search, fortunately for you dear reader, revealed that a high-quality book review penned by Dale Steinreich PhD has already been published in the Fall 2006 edition of The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics.  

I recommend perusal of Steinreich's book review.  I cannot yet recommend purchase of the book because I have yet to scrutinize this work.  I plan to provide a succinct analysis of Lives at Risk in a future blog post. 

Secrecy and Deadly Radiation

4/12/2011

 
I recommend a perusal of the short July 14, 2010 article "Secrecy and Deadly Radiation: On the Birth of the Nuclear Age 65 Years Ago" by Greg Mitchell published on The Nation website.  This feature details the government secrecy surrounding the July 16, 1945 Trinity test, the true dawn of the nuclear age, in the New Mexico desert.  Unsurprisingly, the author documents the biomedically unethical actions of a fascist cabal (government officials in collusion with private citizens).

General Leslie Groves, government scientist Robert Oppenheimer, and NY Times reporter W.L. Laurence merit special condemnation in the article for refusing to evacuate local residents, hiding post-Trinity health reports, and publishing government propaganda regarding the Trinity event, respectively.  All four fundamental TJ/BC bioethical principles (justice, non-maleficence, beneficence, and respect for autonomy) were violated by these actions.  The plumbline libertarian bioethicist is not surprised by the crimes of this cabal.

The author concludes the article by tantalizing the reader with a reference to the "Hiroshima Narrative."  I imagine Greg Mitchell has reported this story elsewhere.  I look forward to reading this bit of revisionist history.     

Physicians for Human Rights

4/5/2011

 
The June 2008 report "Broken Laws, Broken Lives: Medical Evidence of Torture by US Personnel and Its Impact" is another interesting Physicians for Human Rights document.  The report "provides first-hand accounts and medical evidence of torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment ("ill-treatment") of eleven former detainees who were held in US custody overseas."  I recommend review of this report by anyone with a conscience.

The eleven detainees were evaluated on study by two experienced clinicians according to the "guidelines for assessing physical and psychological evidence of torture set out in the Instanbul Protocol, Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment."  Informed consent for the study was obtained prior to clinical evaluation.  No consenting detainees were excluded from the study.

The study found that the eleven detainees experienced "torture and ill-treatment" and "resulting long-term physical and psychological harm."  Common methods of torture and ill-treatment included the following: beatings during arrest/transport/initial custody, deprivation of basic necessities and sanitary conditions, stress positions (forced standing/handcuffing/shackling), isolation, sensory deprivation, bombardment, threats of harm to detainees and their families, use of extreme temperatures, electric shocks, sexual assault, physical assault, sleep deprivation, degrading treatment (sexual/religious/cultural/other), and witnessing torture and cruel treatment.  The study also documented disturbing evidence of complicity of health professionals in the torture and ill-treatment of detainees and denial of medical care to detainees.

The study concluded that "all of the abusive interrogation techniques and patterns of ill-treatment endured by these eleven men ... constituted acts of torture as well as cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under domestic criminal statutes and internal human rights and humanitarian treaties, including the Convention Against torture and the Geneva Conventions, that were in effect at the time the acts were committed."  The executive summary of the report mocks the US government by noting that the US State Department has identified the acts documented in the study as torture when committed by other governments.  The executive summary also mocks the US government by noting that multiple US laws identify the acts documented in the study as torture. 

The plumbline libertarian bioethicist has no qualms with the conduct or conclusions of this disturbing study.  However, the plumbline libertarian bioethicist does dispute the utility of the seven silly recommendations the study makes, for all the recommendations necessitate just action by the US government, which is clearly identified as a criminal organization in the study.  The plumbline libertarian bioethicist, instead, recommends, at a minimum, separation of medicine and state, and, ideally, abolition of the state.   

    LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG

    Author

    Don Stacy is a 47 yo libertarian writer and physician.  His articles have been published by multiple libertarian-themed websites.  He practices medicine as a radiation oncologist in Hazard, KY.     

    Archives

    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010

    Categories

    All
    4 Fundamental Principles
    4 Step Heathcare Solution
    Abigail Alliance
    Abraham Lincoln
    Afterbirth Abortion
    Afterbirth Abortion 2
    Ama Bioethics Principles
    Amnesty International
    Animal Rights
    Animal Rights 2
    Banning A Risky Product
    Beneficence
    Bioethics Consults
    Blog Name
    Blog Plan
    Brain-Dead Bioethics
    Brain Dead Bioethics 2
    British Health Care
    Cancer Drugs
    C.I.A. Doctors
    Circumcision
    Classical-Liberal Bioethics
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 2
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 3
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 4
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 5
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 6
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 7
    Clinical Trials Reporting
    Clinical Trials Reporting 2
    Code Of Federal Regs
    Contractarianism
    Cooperative Groups
    Economics Of Healthcare
    Economics Of Healthcare 2
    Engelhardt And Children
    Engelhardt And Children 2
    Euthanasia
    Evidence-Based Medicine
    Facebook Ethics
    Genetic Results Return
    Genetic Results Return 2
    Guatemala S.T.D. Study
    Influenza Vaccination
    Inst. Review Boards
    Inst. Review Boards 2
    Inst. Review Boards 3
    Inst. Review Boards 4
    Inst. Review Boards 5
    Justice
    Just Price
    Kidney Sellers
    Kidney Sellers 10
    Kidney Sellers 11
    Kidney Sellers 12
    Kidney Sellers 13
    Kidney Sellers 14
    Kidney Sellers 15
    Kidney Sellers 2
    Kidney Sellers 3
    Kidney Sellers 4
    Kidney Sellers 5
    Kidney Sellers 6
    Kidney Sellers 7
    Kidney Sellers 8
    Kidney Sellers 9
    Liberation Biology
    Liberation Biology 2
    Liberation Biology 3
    Liberation Biology 4
    Liberation Biology 5
    Liberation Biology 6
    Liberation Biology 7
    Liberation Biology 8
    Liberation Biology 9
    Libertarian Bioethics
    Libertarian Premises
    Libertarian Premises 2
    Liberty Bioeth And Relig
    Liberty Bioeth And Relig 2
    Liberty Encyclopedia
    Liberty Encyclopedia 2
    Liberty Engelhardt Crit.
    Liberty Engelhardt Crit. 2
    Lives At Risk
    Lives At Risk 2
    Lives At Risk 3
    Lives At Risk 4
    Lives At Risk 5
    Lives At Risk 6
    Lives At Risk 7
    Lives At Risk 8
    Lives At Risk 9
    Mandatory Research Biopsies
    Money May Matter
    National Cancer Institute
    National Cancer Institute 2
    Neuroethics
    Nonmaleficence
    Organ Donation
    P.G.D.
    Phys. For Human Rights 1
    Phys. For Human Rights 2
    Political Triage
    Principles For Allocation
    Principles Of Bioethics
    Principles Of Bioethics 10
    Principles Of Bioethics 2
    Principles Of Bioethics 3
    Principles Of Bioethics 4
    Principles Of Bioethics 5
    Principles Of Bioethics 6
    Principles Of Bioethics 7
    Principles Of Bioethics 8
    Principles Of Bioethics 9
    Rationing Cancer Care
    Respect For Autonomy
    RTOG & NSABP
    Secrecy And Radiation
    Showing That You Care
    Sigrid Fry-Revere
    Skid Row
    Soviet Medicine
    Soviet Medicine 2
    Test
    The Carriage-Trade Trend
    The Chemist's War
    The Expanding Circle
    The Expanding Circle 2
    The Expanding Circle 3
    The Expanding Circle 4
    The Expanding Circle 5
    The Expanding Circle 6
    The Expanding Circle 7
    The Expanding Circle 8
    The Expanding Circle 9
    The Nathaniel Centre
    Tuskegee Syphilis Study
    U.N.E.S.C.O.
    U.S. Human Experiments
    U.S. Medical Experiments
    Warning Labels
    What It Feels Like
    What It Feels Like 2
    What It Feels Like 3
    Why Health Is Not Special

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    ANARCHO-CAPITALIST FLAG
Web Hosting by IPOWER