• home
  • bourbon
  • links
  • blog
  • bio
  • contact form
               donstacy.com

Libertarian Bioethics and Religion

2/28/2012

 
The Libertarianism section of Michael S. Merry's "Libertarian Bioethics and Religion: The Case of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr." paper is the subject of tonight's LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG.  I originally commented on this article on 07/12/11.  I hope my short review of this essay is illuminating.  

In the first paragraph of the Libertarianism section Merry questions the possibility of Christian libertarianism.  Hmmm.  Merry is apparently unfamiliar with Lew Rockwell and Gary North and Thomas Woods.

In the second paragraph Merry argues that Engelhardt's use of biblical references to defend some of his libertarian views is inappropriate.  As an atheist, I frankly do not think anyone should cite the Bible as evidence for anything.  Because I am not a biblical scholar, however, I have no comment on the merits of Merry's discussion.

In the third paragraph Merry criticizes some of Engelhardt's libertarian views from a utilitarian standpoint.  Merry's views are the opposite of reality (e.g., libertarianism is the best economic policy for the poor).  In addition, the proper basis for libertarianism is the rational natural-rights ethic (self-ownership and original appropriation and non-aggression) promulgated by the LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG, not utilitarianism. 

In the fourth paragraph Merry attacks Engelhardt's libertarianism via a positive rights approach (freedom from want).  Merry is apparently unaware that positive rights are illegitimate and, sadly, he is specifically horrified that libertarianism demands that "all social programs have to be premised on the consent of each and every individual person."  Once again I am fascinated by the fact that non-libertarian bioethicists commonly support "patient" autonomy but not "citizen" autonomy.

In the final paragraph Merry finally lands a blow when he queries why "Engelhardt does not believe that transactions - in the form of gifts or bequests - can be compelled by the state" but simultaneously seems "unperturbed about other paternalistic, 'coercive' actions of the State that interfere with individual liberties (e.g., compulsory schooling, scientific research, the building of libraries, roads, parks, defense, emergency relief aid)?"  This the classic libertarian anarchist argument detailing the philosophical incoherence of minarchism.  Bravo, Mr. Merry!  However, Mr. Merry, the appropriate solution to Engelhardt's problem is not to adopt democratic socialism, as you suggest; rather, Engelhardt should abandon minarchism and immediately adopt libertarian anarchism, the philosophy promulgated by the LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG. 

Horrific US Medical Experiments Come to Light

2/21/2012

 
"Horrific US Medical Experiments Come to Light" is the title of a February 27, 2011 aolnews.com article by Mike Stobbe of AP.  This health story details the results of an "exhaustive review by The Associated Press of medical journal reports and decades-old press clippings."  The purpose of the AP study was to unearth unethical U.S. government research.

Regardless of the merits of this excellent article, the first sentence is a howler:  "Shocking as it may seem, U.S. government doctors once thought it was fine to experiment on disabled people and prison inmates."  SHOCKING?  Mr. Stobbe, I guarantee you that readers of the LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG are not shocked to discover that employees of the premier criminal organization in the world (the U.S. government) violated the non-aggression principle while conducting medical research against vulnerable populations.

Similar to the Wikipedia article concerning U.S. government human experimentation detailed in the 05/03/11 LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG post, Stobbe's story provides multiple examples of the approximately 40 unethical studies found by the AP.  Below are lowlights of five of the medical experiments:

     1) "A federally funded study in 1942 injected experimental flu vaccine in male patients at a state insane asylum in Ypsilanti, Mich., then exposed them to flu several months later."
     2) "In federally funded studies in the 1940s, noted researcher Dr. W. Paul Havens Jr. exposed men to hepatitis in a series of experiments, including one using patients from mental institutions in Middletown and Norwich, Conn."
     3) "Researchers in the mid-1940s studied the transmission of a deadly stomach bug by having young men swallow unfiltered stood suspension.  The study was conducted at the New York State Vocational Institution, a reformatory prison in West Coxsackie."
     4) "A University of Minnesota study in the late 1940s injected 11 public service employee volunteers with malaria, then starved them for five days."
     5) "For a study in 1957, when the Asian flu pandemic was spreading, federal researchers sprayed the virus in the noses of 23 inmates at Patuxent prison in Jessup, Md., to compare their reactions to those of 32 virus-exposed inmates who had been given a new vaccine."

A commonality in articles detailing U.S. government crimes is a paragraph quoting an "expert" who provides an excuse (or excuses) for the U.S. government aggression.  This news story is not an exception, for Laura Stark, an assistant professor of science in society at Wesleyan University, states the following: "There was definitely a sense - that we don't have today - that sacrifice for the nation was important."  SACRIFICE FOR THE NATION?  Allowing aggression against a vulnerable member of society is not a sacrifice, Assistant Professor Stark; rather, allowing aggression against a vulnerable member of society (or for that matter any member of society) is aiding and abetting a crime.    

U.S. Apologizes for Guatemala STD Experiments

2/7/2012

 
I first learned about the U.S. government STD inoculation study in Guatemala  from an October 2010 msnbc.com article by Robert Bazell titled "U.S. apologizes for Guatemala STD experiments."  The LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG obviously opposes criminal government medical research.  Below I tantalize readers with a sample of morsels from this shameful news item:

     U.S. government crime: "U.S. government medical researchers intentionally infected hundreds of people in Guatemala, including institutionalized mental patients, with gonorrhea and syphilis without their knowledge or permission more than 60 years ago." 

     U.S. government excuses: "Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research could have occurred under the guise of public health." Also, "officials noted that there were no formalized regulations regarding protection of human studies during the 1940s."

     U.S. government criminal accomplice: "The STD experiments were conducted with the cooperation of the Guatemalan government."

     U.S. government untruths: "As we move forward to better understand this appalling event, we reaffirm the importance of our relationship with Guatemala, and our respect for the Guatemalan people, as well as our commitment to the highest standards of ethics in medical research."

     U.S. government plan to expand imperialism into the realm of medical research: "In addition to the apology, the U.S. is setting up commissions to ensure that human medical research conducted around the globe meets "rigorous ethical standards.""

    LIBERTARIAN BIOETHICS BLOG

    Author

    Don Stacy is a 47 yo libertarian writer and physician.  His articles have been published by multiple libertarian-themed websites.  He practices medicine as a radiation oncologist in Hazard, KY.     

    Archives

    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010

    Categories

    All
    4 Fundamental Principles
    4 Step Heathcare Solution
    Abigail Alliance
    Abraham Lincoln
    Afterbirth Abortion
    Afterbirth Abortion 2
    Ama Bioethics Principles
    Amnesty International
    Animal Rights
    Animal Rights 2
    Banning A Risky Product
    Beneficence
    Bioethics Consults
    Blog Name
    Blog Plan
    Brain-Dead Bioethics
    Brain Dead Bioethics 2
    British Health Care
    Cancer Drugs
    C.I.A. Doctors
    Circumcision
    Classical-Liberal Bioethics
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 2
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 3
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 4
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 5
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 6
    Classical Liberal Bioethics 7
    Clinical Trials Reporting
    Clinical Trials Reporting 2
    Code Of Federal Regs
    Contractarianism
    Cooperative Groups
    Economics Of Healthcare
    Economics Of Healthcare 2
    Engelhardt And Children
    Engelhardt And Children 2
    Euthanasia
    Evidence-Based Medicine
    Facebook Ethics
    Genetic Results Return
    Genetic Results Return 2
    Guatemala S.T.D. Study
    Influenza Vaccination
    Inst. Review Boards
    Inst. Review Boards 2
    Inst. Review Boards 3
    Inst. Review Boards 4
    Inst. Review Boards 5
    Justice
    Just Price
    Kidney Sellers
    Kidney Sellers 10
    Kidney Sellers 11
    Kidney Sellers 12
    Kidney Sellers 13
    Kidney Sellers 14
    Kidney Sellers 15
    Kidney Sellers 2
    Kidney Sellers 3
    Kidney Sellers 4
    Kidney Sellers 5
    Kidney Sellers 6
    Kidney Sellers 7
    Kidney Sellers 8
    Kidney Sellers 9
    Liberation Biology
    Liberation Biology 2
    Liberation Biology 3
    Liberation Biology 4
    Liberation Biology 5
    Liberation Biology 6
    Liberation Biology 7
    Liberation Biology 8
    Liberation Biology 9
    Libertarian Bioethics
    Libertarian Premises
    Libertarian Premises 2
    Liberty Bioeth And Relig
    Liberty Bioeth And Relig 2
    Liberty Encyclopedia
    Liberty Encyclopedia 2
    Liberty Engelhardt Crit.
    Liberty Engelhardt Crit. 2
    Lives At Risk
    Lives At Risk 2
    Lives At Risk 3
    Lives At Risk 4
    Lives At Risk 5
    Lives At Risk 6
    Lives At Risk 7
    Lives At Risk 8
    Lives At Risk 9
    Mandatory Research Biopsies
    Money May Matter
    National Cancer Institute
    National Cancer Institute 2
    Neuroethics
    Nonmaleficence
    Organ Donation
    P.G.D.
    Phys. For Human Rights 1
    Phys. For Human Rights 2
    Political Triage
    Principles For Allocation
    Principles Of Bioethics
    Principles Of Bioethics 10
    Principles Of Bioethics 2
    Principles Of Bioethics 3
    Principles Of Bioethics 4
    Principles Of Bioethics 5
    Principles Of Bioethics 6
    Principles Of Bioethics 7
    Principles Of Bioethics 8
    Principles Of Bioethics 9
    Rationing Cancer Care
    Respect For Autonomy
    RTOG & NSABP
    Secrecy And Radiation
    Showing That You Care
    Sigrid Fry-Revere
    Skid Row
    Soviet Medicine
    Soviet Medicine 2
    Test
    The Carriage-Trade Trend
    The Chemist's War
    The Expanding Circle
    The Expanding Circle 2
    The Expanding Circle 3
    The Expanding Circle 4
    The Expanding Circle 5
    The Expanding Circle 6
    The Expanding Circle 7
    The Expanding Circle 8
    The Expanding Circle 9
    The Nathaniel Centre
    Tuskegee Syphilis Study
    U.N.E.S.C.O.
    U.S. Human Experiments
    U.S. Medical Experiments
    Warning Labels
    What It Feels Like
    What It Feels Like 2
    What It Feels Like 3
    Why Health Is Not Special

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    ANARCHO-CAPITALIST FLAG
Web Hosting by IPOWER